Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1604
|
Posted - 2015.04.23 15:52:23 -
[1] - Quote
Commander Spurty wrote:And this is why noob corp should not be allowed to post here.
CCP should make this forum hidden for NPC corp members (see Corp discussion for hints as to why this is a very tangible suggestion).
You already can make private chat with each other and post there 'HUE HUE! Those bears!'. Actually every serious corporation already has its own private forum. But for some reason you go here to do it? Now imagine that all your bravery and ... will not be seen to those who you are trying to troll. For how long you will post such things?
That's why your idea of restricting access to forum is stupid.
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1649
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 08:19:55 -
[2] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: Let this sink in: mining is fun.
Just remember everyone, this person wants CCP to listen to them, and change the game accordingly. Apparently, into something even more boring and pointless than the average facebook game. By the way, according to CCP's own numbers on retention, mining is not fun. In fact, it's probably the least enjoyable thing in the game. I would not disagree with that assertion, either. According to CCP's data PvP is not fun for largest part of customer base. Why do you do it? 
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1652
|
Posted - 2015.05.22 11:34:25 -
[3] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Shiloh Templeton wrote:Numbers seem to have taken another drop for the last several weeks.
Haven't exactly been keeping up on my stats since my second kid was born a little bit ago, but doesn't concurrency drop literally every summer? Yea, - summer - all people have vacations - winter - New Year, Christmas, etc... - fall and spring - kids went to schools
Literally for every day of year there is some reason why numbers can drop. And it has nothing with the game itself 
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1652
|
Posted - 2015.05.22 11:47:20 -
[4] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: For recognized criminal behaviour in Eve, the consequences are too light and easy to avoid but finding the right balance is the key.
Compared to what? Nothing else is penalized, you can't even make the argument for mission runners anymore, since they decoupled standings from pos use. It's really strange to see people try and argue that the only thing in highsec that actually has consequences for it's actions should get more, in the name of there not being any consequences for anyone else. Actually, it's not strange, it's just hypocrisy. Ever heard about faction NPC attacking capsuleers with too low standings? Ever heard about Market taxes? Ever heard about agent requirements?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1653
|
Posted - 2015.05.22 12:32:38 -
[5] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:yeah, mission runners have to occasionally reject two missions in a row for being anti-empire
now try and tell me there's no consequences to mission running D: Let me tell you about standing loss from killing NPCs in missions. Let me tell you about relations between empires.
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1653
|
Posted - 2015.05.22 13:45:23 -
[6] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:the, uh, standings loss i didn't suffer for the npcs i didn't kill because i rejected the mission immediately after looking it up on eve survival
and gained an anti-pirate mission instead
that standings loss, right Let me tell you about Pirate Faction agents, LP and stuff.
Let me remind you about relations between factions
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1653
|
Posted - 2015.05.22 13:57:47 -
[7] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:Negating a player to fly his ship (destroyed ships don't fly) = good Potentially negating a player to fly his ship for a while = bad
Being unable to fly your ship because someone messed with you = good Being unable to fly your ship because you messed with someone = bad The difference being that destroyed ships can be replaced, instantly. wrong. You need ISK, time and market.
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Quote:PvPr: "But, but, you can destroy my ship too! Even if I don't give a f*** of it...!" PvEr: "Huh, no, I'd rather hit you where it hurts you, for a change. So say good bye to Small Hybrid Weapons IV for the next few days (or anything equally annoying)" Different mindsets, one sees ships as disposable tools, the other sees them as valuable objects but for the most part fails to take steps to protect them. Your mindset only matters to you. Result is what matters at the end. Does it hurt? Or no one even noticed?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1655
|
Posted - 2015.05.25 13:53:33 -
[8] - Quote
Actually there is ISK sink in destroying. I'm talking about FW LP stuff which needs ISK+LP to be bought and then has 0 ISK/LP insurance payout. Example: Caldari Navy Drake, Caldari Navy Warden/Wasp. For such things Eve client shows killmail with very low value and provides almost 0 LP of reward.
Other example: Gnosis. We got BPCs and we spent some ISK to manufacture the ship. And when Gnosis dies insurance returns few ISK 
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1656
|
Posted - 2015.05.26 16:54:43 -
[9] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:0bama Barack ******* wrote:GankYou wrote:CCP are an ambitious and very talented company, they will not be content with 60k PCU forever, if it can be 150k PCU. Can servers hold it?  I think they overextended on non-Eve projects and under-delivered on Incarna/WiS. There is time to rectify that after the Summer expansions and the Citadel structure system. http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility
Seems to me getting even 40K peak even at weekends seems now though job, especially if June expansion fails to meet expectations. As I have said, CCP needs to focus/return to special (and only) kind of niche game (players) they have had so far to get back on growth. You are "doing an EFT". That's what I call it, someone will have a better term for it. EFT is great, it's light weight and portable and lets you theory craft and is IMO the best fitting tool around. What it can't do is tell you if your ship fit makes sense in EVE online. It can help, but it's not the whole story. Same with EVE Offline. It can't tell you the whole story. It can't tell you that I (the owner of 4 accounts with 11 characters) have only logged in 3 of that 11 characters at all in the last 4 weeks because my alliance moved out of SOV space so I'm running high sec incursions on one screen while FoF Raven mission running on another (ie using only 2 characters at a time) instead of Quad Boxing FoF Navy Ravens in null anomalies (news flash, i like FoF missiles...and Navy Ravens....). I'm not the only one in that boat, lots of people are inactive waiting for FozzieSov. PCU counts (and CCPs PR-ish touting of 'increasing subs' that they used to do) never told the whole story, it never tells you who is an alt and who isn't, who is on vacation and who is in school or who can't play because he wife threatened divorce unless he spends more time with her and less with his avatar that he made that looks just like her (lol). TL;DR, the thing you are basing your opinion on doesn't mean anything. I like you theory but.... It's been long time since last thread 'why i can't enter Jita'. Do you think it happened just because some players put their alts to pause?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1675
|
Posted - 2015.06.07 18:37:16 -
[10] - Quote
HeXxploiT wrote:Why do people keep repeating low numbers? Almost 37k users on at this moment. Every weekend it looks the same to me. Think you guys look at times when timbuktu is the prime timezone.  Some of us remember the days when people cried on forums "Jita! Let me in!".... Because you know: it used to get full and make you sit on incoming gates waiting for .... Great times 
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1675
|
Posted - 2015.06.08 00:48:44 -
[11] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:March rabbit wrote:HeXxploiT wrote:Why do people keep repeating low numbers? Almost 37k users on at this moment. Every weekend it looks the same to me. Think you guys look at times when timbuktu is the prime timezone.  Some of us remember the days when people cried on forums "Jita! Let me in!".... Because you know: it used to get full and make you sit on incoming gates waiting for .... Great times  And then CCP fixed it so that 2000 people could be in Jita at once. really? I've never seen 2000 since then.... 1700 max....
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1683
|
Posted - 2015.06.11 18:39:42 -
[12] - Quote
Moth Eisig wrote:GankYou wrote:Exceeded the highs - went below them by that logic?  Just admit you misread, or misunderstood, Just admit you misused or misunderstood the definition of exceed. being not native I got it right. So i think he used right words
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1692
|
Posted - 2015.06.13 23:04:53 -
[13] - Quote
Market McSelling Alt wrote:DrSmegma wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: I read that as "Content A is so terrible that players A quit a lot more than players B; CCP should improve content A to better retain those players"
Except that CCP has already pushed people in the direction of A for nearly a decade now. So instead of trying anything different and giving some incentive to B for once, you are suggesting that they double down on A, a known failure. And the rest of us think you're nuts. Haa haa you spent a decade of your life on a computer game. He spent a decade of his life in a video game that was apparently catering only to the kinds of players he has a psychotic disposition to hate... which is more sad. Maybe he just NEEDs to have such people IN THE GAME so he can do something to them? Maybe it makes his RL better?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1695
|
Posted - 2015.06.14 07:29:50 -
[14] - Quote
GankYou wrote:Aza Ebanu wrote:GankYou wrote:Aza Ebanu wrote:GankYou wrote:Level 4 missions & Incursions.  Completely out of whack compared to Hisec mining, for example. Ahem... LVL 4's are a form of low sec buff  Last time I checked they were still in Hisec? I remember doing them in 2008 with close to 75-90 mil ISK per hour income, but possibly higher. The LP exchange rate has been devalued since then, though - courtesy of the FW brethren.  Yeah but LP boost and mission bonus are higher the lower you go. So high sec missions aren't really superior to null sec PVE at all. What is the difference? Probably not a lot. In null due to the fact of bubbles and dictors alone, I'd use something like a 3x reward multiplier. With Lowsecks it's a bit different - their Tier system floods the market with LP, thereby devaluing it in the medium term, i.e. getting 1,300 ISK / LP at Tier 3 is the same as receiving 2,275 ISK / LP at Tier 2 due to 75% more LP being generated - not sure whther this bonus applies to every single LP source. Some people claim that they get 14-15K LP for 1 burner mission in NPC 0.0. For comparison in Dodixie i get 5-8K. It gives almost 3x multiplayer.
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
|
|